|
Info Library
Recommended Reading:
Reference Info:
Conversion Tables:
Online Safety Training:
Resource Center:
Free Info:
Email For:
Need Assistance?
|
| |

Interested
in having timely and informative safety-related information sent
directly to your e-mail box? LSS publishes our no-charge Saf-T-News
every other
week. To begin receiving your copy, click here.
Selecting Chemical Protective Clothing for Vapor and Splash Protection

Document Number: 190
Introduction
The use of chemical protective clothing (CPC) is only one aspect of a comprehensive
program for ensuring the safety and health of workers. Careful planning,
work practices and engineering (isolation) and administrative (avoidance)
controls should also be considered. In fact, they are required by OSHA
under 29
CFR 1910.120 as a preliminary step in limiting worker exposures to
hazards. If circumstances prohibit the use of engineering controls or
work practices, or these measures do not sufficiently reduce worker exposures,
OSHA mandates that personal protective equipment (PPE) be used.
Once the need for PPE is established, a careful evaluation of the
hazards is necessary so that a selection can be made that minimizes
the risk to the user. For chemical situations, knowing the hazard
includes being aware of: the type of chemical, the physical state
(liquid, solid or gas), and the physiological effect (toxic,
carcinogen, asphyxiant, corrosive, etc.). Knowing the level of
exposure is also important when selecting protective clothing and
equipment.
Level of Risk
To help users choose a total PPE package, OSHA offers guidance
on determining the four levels of chemical risks. These levels range from
unknown or highly hazardous, which requires complete protection, to non-hazardous,
which requires only basic work attire.
Level A
provides the highest level of skin and respiratory protection available.
This type of protection must be gas-tight, vapor-tight and splash resistant.
It is worn when there is a possible threat to life and health, such as
during spill response and cleanup.
The minimum Level A equipment consists of:
Positive-pressure, self-contained
breathing apparatus (SCBA)
Gas-tight suit
Chemical-resistant
inner and outer gloves
Chemical-resistant boots with steel toe and shank
Level B
offers protection from chemical splash, but does not prevent exposure
to gases or vapors. As with Level A, an SCBA is used for respiratory protection.
The CPC may or may not be completely encapsulating, since a lower level
of skin protection is required.
The minimum Level B equipment consists of:
Positive-pressure SCBA
Chemical-resistant suit
Chemical-resistant
inner and outer gloves
Chemical-resistant boots with steel toe and shank
Level C features the same type of clothing as Level B, but
has a lower level of respiratory protection. An air-purifying
respirator is used in place of an SCBA. This level is used when the
chemicals are known and it has been established that an air-purifying
respirator is appropriate protection for the hazard.
Level D offers the lowest level of protection and is used when no
potential or actual hazard exists. It consists of a normal work uniform
(long sleeve coveralls, safety shoes, goggles, etc.), offering minimal
protection for nuisance exposure. (See OSHA
29 CFR 1910.120 Appendix B for specific information on the definition
of protection levels.)
Material Selection
After the appropriate level of PPE has been determined, the choice
of CPC material must be considered. Among the more important factors
in selecting the appropriate CPC are chemical resistance and suit
design. The effectiveness of the CPC to resist chemicals can be
measured by permeation testing.
Permeation testing produces the following data: breakthrough time
and permeation rate. Permeation is the process by which a chemical
moves through a sample of protective clothing material on a molecular
level. Permeation tests are conducted following the ASTM
International (ASTM) F739 test method. The outside surface of a test
material is subjected to a challenge chemical using the ASTM F739 test
cell. Breakthrough to the inside surface of the material is determined
by monitoring the collection side of the test cell and determining when
the chemical has permeated.
Breakthrough time is the time it takes the test chemical to
pass through the clothing sample until it is first detected by an
analytical instrument.
Permeation rate is the speed at which the test chemical
passes through the clothing sample once breakthrough has occurred.
The ASTM F739 method only tests a swatch of the actual CPC fabric.
This means that the potential for permeation through a zipper, seam,
face shield, etc. is not determined.
Chemical resistance data are frequently published and available from
many manufacturers and distributors. Unpublished data may be supplied
by manufacturers upon request.
Suit design deals with how a garment is put together. Seams are
an important aspect of suit design. Two pieces of material can be joined
by stitching or welding. The stitching process can create pin holes that
may allow penetration of chemicals. Welded seams involve cementing or
welding tape over the stitched seam. The welded (sealed) seam offers a
higher level of protection against exposure to contaminants.
NFPA Standards
Developments within the last few years have made the selection of
CPC easier for employers. The National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) has devised performance manufacturing standards for CPC.
NFPA
1991, Standard on Vapor-Protective Suits for Hazardous Chemical Emergencies,
(1994 Edition) covers gas-tight suits. A suit meeting NFPA 1991 requirements
is equal to the clothing required by EPA's Level A.
NFPA
1992, Standard on Liquid Splash-Protective Suits for Hazardous Chemical
Emergencies (1994 Edition)covers splash-protective garments. Garments
meeting NFPA 1992 requirements are equal to the clothing required in EPA's
Level B.
NFPA developed these standards to provide users with information on suit
integrity, resistance to chemicals and flame, durability, and function
of components. Garments that meet the NFPA requirements are approved and
marked with a Safety Equipment Institute
(SEI) label.
Click here for more
information information on NFPA standards.
Product Reference
Lab Safety Supply has
the products you need to keep your workers safe and comply with current
regulations. Please refer to the Clothing, Eyewear, Face Shields, Footwear,
Gloves, Hard Hats and Respirators sections of your Lab Safety Supply General
Safety Catalog for details.
Sources for More Information
29
CFR 1910.120, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
29
CFR 1910.120 Appendix B
Dupont information on Industry
Methods, Standards & Regulations
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 272-0167
National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA)
1 Batterymarch Park
Quincy, MA 02269
(617) 770-3000
ASTM International (ASTM)
100 Barr Harbor Drive
West Conshohocken, PA
(610) 832-9500
Safety Equipment Institute (SEI)
1307 Dolley Madison Boulevard Suite 3A
McLean VA 22101
(703) 442-5732
Works Consulted
- Anderson, K. J., and J. G. Johnson (eds.), Chemical Protective
Clothing, Vol. 1, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Akron,
OH, 1990.
- "Focus On Protective Clothing," Applied Industrial
Hygiene, 4 (1), January 1989, pp. R1R5.
- Forsberg, K.; and S. Z. Mansdorf, Quick
Selection Guide To Chemical Protective Clothing, 3rd. ed., Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York, 1997.
- Roder, M. M., A Guide
for Evaluating the Performance of Chemical Protective Clothing,
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, 1990.
- Sabatino, J., "Dress For The Party (Selection Of Personal
Protective Equipment)," Environmental Waste Management
Magazine, 8 (6), June 1990, pp. 810.
- Say, D. J., "Chemical Protective Clothing: Still A Long Way
To Go," Fire Engineering, 114 (8), August 1991, pp. 8688,
9092.
- Schroll, R. C., "Emergency-Response CPC is Last Line of
Defense," Safety & Protective Fabrics, 2 (2), May 1993, pp.
2023.
- "Selecting Personal Protective Equipment," Hazmat
World, 4 (11), November 1991, pp. 62, 64.
- Tompkins, N. C., "The Fit Of Chemical Protective Clothing
Remains Flexible For Evolving Standards," Occupational Health &
Safety, 56 (1), January 1994, pp. 46, 4849.
FREE Technical Support
When you have a question, you can rely on our team of technical
experts. They'll answer your questions about product specifications,
chemical compatibility, regulatory issues, and general worker safety
and health.
Call our Safety TECHline Technical Support toll-free:
800-356-2501 (6 a.m. to 9 p.m. CT, Monday - Friday). Or e-mail our
Technical Support Staff at techsvc@labsafety.com
anytime!
FREE Catalog
For products to meet all your workplace safety and industrial
needs, turn to Lab Safety Supply. In it you'll find thousands of
safety and industrial products, plus a complete service package and
our 100% guarantee to stand behind them.
Click
here to select a catalog and fill out a request form on-line, or
call today to reserve your free copy: 800-356-0783 (7 a.m. to 9 p.m.
CT, Monday - Friday).
Please Note: The information contained in this
publication is intended for general information purposes only. This
publication is not a substitute for review of the applicable government
regulations and standards, and should not be construed as legal advice
or opinion. Readers with specific questions should refer to the cited
regulation or consult with an attorney.
|
|
|
|
|