Back to Contents
 |
OSHA Finalizes Powered Industrial Truck Training |
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
published a final rule in the December 1, 1998 Federal Register to
clarify training requirements to the Powered Industrial Truck
regulation (29CFR1910.178). The revised regulation requires a
combination of classroom training, demonstration/practical
exercises and a successful evaluation of the operator skills prior
to operating a powered truck. This final rule became effective
March 1, 1999.
The classroom training can be in the form of lectures, video
tape programs, interactive computer learning programs, or
discussions. The classroom and practical exercises must address
specific truck-related and workplace-related topics. These topics
include the following: Truck-Related Topics
- Operating instructions, precautions, and warnings for the
type of truck to be used.
- Differences between an industrial truck and automobile.
- Industrial truck controls and instruments: location and
operation.
- Steering and maneuvering.
- Visibility.
- Vehicle capacity.
- Vehicle stability.
- Vehicle inspection and service the employee may perform.
- Refueling and/or recharging of batteries.
- Operating limitations.
- Other instructions listed in the vehicle operator's manual.
Workplace-Related Topics
- Surface conditions where vehicle will be used.
- Composition and stability of loads.
- Load stacking, un-stacking and manipulation.
- Pedestrian traffic.
- Narrow aisle and limited area operation.
- Classified hazardous locations of operation.
- Ramps and sloped surfaces.
- Closed environments with poor ventilation with the potential
of high carbon monoxide levels.
- Other unique or potential hazardous conditions.
All training must be conducted by individuals who have
knowledge, training, and experience to train operators and
evaluate their abilities. The practical training exercises must be
done under the direct supervision of the trainer in circumstances
that will not endanger the trainee or others.
In order to ensure the effectiveness of the training, an
evaluation of operator performance must be completed every three
years. In addition, refresher training is required if an operator
has driven an industrial truck in an unsafe manner, been involved
in a near-miss or accident, has received an unsatisfactory
evaluation, or if the truck or workplace conditions change.
Employers must certify each operator has been trained and
evaluated. Certification must include the name of the trainee, the
trainer, and the dates of training and evaluation. Existing
industrial truck operators hired before December 1, 1999 must have
initial training and evaluation by that date. New operators must
have training before the assignment to operate a truck.
The final rule also includes non-mandatory appendixes that
supplement the required truck and workplace topics. Additional
information can be obtained at OSHA's Web site at
www.osha.gov.
Back to Contents
 |
Safety Incentive Programs: Traditional vs.
Non-Traditional |
Incentive programs are used in many industries as a tool to
reward safe behavior, reduce workplace accidents and minimize
recordable lost workdays. These programs are instituted by the
employer and are not required by OSHA. Traditional and
non-traditional are the two categories of incentive programs found
within industry today.
Traditional programs reward employees based on numbers, such
as no recordable injuries or lost workdays. Non-traditional
programs reward employees for participation in safety activities
like safety quizzes, safety meetings or exhibiting safe behavior.
While traditional programs are more commonly used, they've
come under scrutiny in recent times. Because traditional programs
reward employees for low numbers, employees may be reluctant to
report an injury because of peer pressure. Employees could view a
co-worker who reports an injury as someone who's taking away the
group's reward. This type of employee mind-set does not
necessarily make for a safer workplace.
For this reason, non-traditional incentive programs have come
into vogue. These programs are geared to eliminate the peer
pressure to not document an injury or safety concern. They use a
more proactive approach to safety by rewarding participation and
safe behavior to create a culture of safety awareness within a
workplace. Programs like these may eventually become more
commonplace than traditional programs.
Back to Contents
 |
Measuring for Conductivity & Total Dissolved Solids |
Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids are measurements used in
a variety of industrial and chemical processes. Here are a few
basics about each measurement.
In its simplest terms, conductivity is the measure of how
well electricity, or current, flows through a liquid. It is
measured in siemens, micro (µS), or milli (mS) per cubic
centimeter (cm). Generally, the more ions a liquid has, the easier
current flows through it. For example: current flows much better
through salt water than through very pure liquids like distilled
water. Listed below are conductivity levels of some common
liquids:
| Deionized Water |
055µS/cm |
| Drinking Water |
100µS/cm |
| Ocean Water |
53 mS/cm |
TDS is the total dissolved solid in an aqueous solution. High
levels of dissolved solids produce high conductivity readings. Low
levels of TDS produce low conductivity readings. Different
dissolved solids produce different conductivity readings. It is
measured in parts per million (ppm) or parts per thousand (ppt).
Both measurements have many applications in industrial and
scientific processes. For instance, in semiconductor manufacturing
applications there's a need to monitor the purity of rinse water
that cleans the semiconductors. High conductivity values alert
operators to change the rinse water. In industrial cleaning,
sterilizing and plating operations conductivity is used to monitor
effectiveness; in addition, the strength of readings will indicate
whether solutions can be recycled for further use or must be
replaced.
The following are some commonly asked questions pertaining to
conductivity and TDS:
Q: How are conductivity and TDS related?
A: Salts, minerals and even dissolved gases contribute
uniformly to the conductivity of a solution. This means that the
conductivity can be used as an indicator of the amount of
dissolved material in a solution. TDS can be used fairly
accurately when comparing the status of a single source, such as
sodium chloride (NaCl), but errors can arise when trying to
compare two different types of solutions. It is necessary to
calibrate the meter using the same dissolved materials that are in
the test solution.
Q: How do I calibrate my conductivity meter?
A: Calibrate using a standard solution in the range of the
samples you are testing. Place the probe in a standard solution
condition, rinse the probe in a second sample of standard
solution, use a third sample of standard solution to calibrate,
and then adjust the cell until the specified value is displayed.
Q: The standardization solution I purchased has three TDS
values listed on it. Which one should I use?
A: It depends on what you are measuring. If the solution you
are measuring is close to NaCl use ppm/NaCl. If you are measuring
natural water, use ppm/442. If the solution is similar to
potassium chloride (KCl) use ppm/KCl.
What is the difference between microsiemen and micromhos?
A: There is no difference. Micromhos is more common in the
US, while microsiemens is more common in Europe.
Back to Contents
 |
OSHA Adds Interactive Advisory Programs |
Users Can Get Answers on 11 Safety Topics
OSHA has added a service called "OSHA Advisors" to
their Web site. This interactive service allows users to pick a
safety or compliance related topic, then answer questions about
their own workplace. Some of the programs will write a report as a
reference guide to assist in developing a company program.
Presently, there are 11 topics available. Of these 11, six
are public test versions. Public test versions do not represent
official OSHA policy. The OSHA Advisors can be accessed at OSHA's
Web site at http://www.osha.gov
under "Outreach OSHA Advisors."
Of the more notable topics, one can find a
Respiratory Protection Advisor, a
Hazard Awareness Advisor, and an
Asbestos Advisor.
The Respiratory protection Advisor
addresses the proper selection of respiratory protection as well
as the development of change-out schedules for gas/vapor
cartridges. While this Advisor is still a public test version, it
is none-the-less one more source of information for employers
seeking guidance on OSHA's revised Respiratory Protection
Standard.
In terms of respirator selection, this Advisor discusses
exposure assessment and the factors that can influence selection
under the "Learn How To Select an Appropriate Respirator"
heading.
For those seeking guidance determining cartridge change-out
schedules, the Advisor Genius is accessible under the "Learn
How To Develop a Change Schedule" heading. The Advisor Genius
takes information on the physical parameters of the compound
you're working with and calculates a change-out schedule. Because
of the amount of detailed information required, it's wise to have
your MSDS ready when accessing the Advisor Genius.
The Hazard Awareness Advisor, also a
public test version, asks the user about the workplace and
continues with follow-up questions based on the previous answer.
When the survey about workplace environments has been completed,
the program writes a customized report about possible hazards and
related OSHA rules.
The Asbestos Advisor is the original
program that started the interactive advisory program. This
Advisor interviews you about a building; asks follow-up questions
and writes a report on your reponsibilities under the Asbestos
rules.
Back to Contents
 |
Computer Vision Syndrome: Is It Affecting Your Bottom
Line? |
Employees who spend long periods of time in front of computer
monitors are prime candidates for a workplace malady called
computer vision syndrome (CVS). Symptoms of CVS run the gamut from
tired, dry, burning eyes, to watery eyes, headaches, neck/shoulder
pain, blurred or double vision, and general fatigue.
The American Optometric Association says CVS is a "complex
of eye and vision problems...experienced during or related to
computer use." If employees are spending three hours or more
a day working at their computers they're susceptible to the
aforementioned CVS symptoms. For some workers, CVS symptoms can be
precursors to low morale and reduced productivity (a decrease of 4
to 8%) according to laboratory studies).
If you or your employees experience any of the CVS symptoms
mentioned above, try implementing the following steps to ease the
discomfort:
- Keep computer screen slightly below eye level--the center of
the screen should be 4 to 9 inches below eye level.
- Maintain 20-26 inches between your eyes and the computer.
- Maintain your screen at moderate brightness and maximum
contrast.
- Keep the screen clean.
- Modify lighting to eliminate glare and reflections.
- Take frequent mini-breaks. Look away periodically to give
your eyes a rest.
- If your eyes feel dry, blink rapidly to remoisten them.
- In some cases, special glasses may help to alleviate many of
the symptoms.
At this time, there is no scientific evidence that computer use
causes long-term eye damage. However, if CVS symptoms persist, see
your eye doctor. Let your doctor know which symptoms you have and
how often they occur.
Back to Contents
 |
Most Cited OSHA Standards: '98 vs '91 |
The December 1998 issue of Safety + Health Magazine
compares the most frequently cited OSHA Standards from fiscal '98
to those from fiscal '91. The article, "OSHA's Big 10",
includes statistics that reveal a decrease in the number of
citations for paperwork-related standards over the seven year
period.
While the Hazard Communication Standard in general industry
topped the list both years, the total number of HazCom violations
dropped from 19,116 violations in '91, to 7,505 in '98. In '91
HazCom in the construction industry ranked second in the total
number of citations; in '98 it ranked number 64.
The following are statistics presented in the article
comparing OSHA's top 10 most frequently cited standards for '98
and '91:
| Fiscal '98 |
Number of citations |
| 1. Hazard Communication-General Industry |
7,505 |
| 2. Scaffolding-Construction |
6,239 |
| 3. Fall Protection-Construction |
4,369 |
| 4. Lockout/Tagout |
3,532 |
| 5. Electrical-Wiring, etc. |
2,990 |
| 6. Mechanical Power Presses |
2,868 |
| 7. Machine Guarding |
2,576 |
| 8. Mechanical Power-Transmission |
2,387 |
| 9. Personal Protective Equipment |
2,101 |
| 10. Electrical System Design |
2,060 |
| Fiscal '91 |
Number of citations |
| 1. Hazard Communication-General Industry |
19,116 |
| 2. Hazard Communication-Construction Industry |
16,799 |
| 3. Lockout/Tagout |
6,046 |
| 4. Mechanical Power-Transmission |
4,972 |
| 5. Scaffolding |
4,961 |
| 6. OSHA Log and Summary |
4,593 |
| 7. Electrical-Wiring |
4,305 |
| 8. OSHA Log and Summary-Posters |
4,164 |
| 9. Machine Guarding |
4,061 |
| 10. Access to Employee Exposure & Medical Records |
3,900 |
Back to Contents
 |
BBP Standard's Exposure Control Plan |
The Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (BBP) 29 CFR 1910.1030 has
been in existence for seven years. When this standard became law
in 1991, there was considerable confusion on the part of employers
and their employees on what their responsibilities were regarding
compliance.
One of the critical components of the BBP Standard is the
employer's Exposure Control Plan. This is the written program that
sets the policies and guidelines for employees who may be exposed
to bloodborne pathogens during their work activities. The exposure
control plan should be designed so that it eliminates or minimizes
employee exposure. To eliminate or minimize exposure, the plan
needs to contain the following components:
Exposure Determination. The exposure determination
shall contain a list of job classifications in which all employees
may have occupational exposure to BBP, and a list of job
classifications in which some employees may have exposure. A list
of all tasks and procedures in which exposure occurs in these
classifications shall also be listed.
Methods of Compliance. Universal precautions should
be observed to prevent contact with blood or other potentially
infectious materials. All body fluids should be considered
potentially infectious material. Engineering and work practice
controls should be used to eliminate or minimize exposure. Where
there is a chance of exposure, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
must be used. There are many directives in the section "Engineering
and Work Practice Controls," including procedures for capping
needles, sharps disposal, handwashing, etc., that must be
followed. These are found under the Exposure Control Plan (d)(2)
portion of 1910.1030.
The standard also includes guidelines for specific conditions
found in high risk environments or for crucial procedures such as:
HIV and HBV Research Laboratories and Production Facilities
which is found at paragraph (e) of the standard applies to
facilities which are engaged in the culture, production,
concentration, experimentation, and manipulation of HIV and HBV.
Hepatitis B vaccination and post-exposure evaluation.
This section, (f), outlines the criteria for the employer's
responsibilities for medical evaluations and procedures regarding
the Hepatitis B vaccination of affected employees. Also outlined
is the employees' right of refusal of the vaccination,
post-exposure procedures and evaluations.
Communication of hazards to employees. This paragraph
explains the information and training that needs to be given to
the employees on labeling and signage required under this
standard. The use of colors and symbols for biohazards are also
clarified in this paragraph.
Once the plan is complete it needs to be reviewed annually or
whenever procedures or tasks change, or if any new routes of
exposure become apparent. The plan needs to be accessible to
employees within the time frame of their work-shift.
Back to Contents
 |
Digital Multimeters: Uses and Features |
One of the most popular, versatile, and useful electrical
testing instruments is the Digital Multimeter, also known as a
DMM. DMMs are considered the best overall meter available for use
with energized as well as de-energized electrical circuits.
Selection of a DMM should be made based upon the measurements
needed. For example: a precision DMM is required if you need more
exact, small value measurements in resistance and current and the
capability to check transistors and diodes. Digital meters are
generally accurate to within 0.1% to 0.5% of the reading.
Autoranging, or dialing, is also a useful feature to look for
in a DMM. It allows the user to quickly move from the instrument's
various measuring scales while maintaining accurate readings.
Another important feature to consider when selecting a DMM is
whether it's a True RMS (Root Mean Square) meter. An RMS value is
also called the effective or heating value of an AC signal. The
RMS value is equivalent to DC voltage that provides the same
amount of heat generated by a resistor as AC voltage would if
applied to that same resistor. Since an AC signal's voltage rises
and falls with time, it takes more AC voltage to produce a given
RMS voltage. A handy formula to remember is peak volts AC x
.707=VRMS (volts root mean square). A power grid that must produce
169 volts peak AC turns out to be 120 volts RMS (.707 x 169). What
does all this mean? The typical DMM is not a True RMS (Root Mean
Square) meter and, as a result, it will produce misleading voltage
readings when used to measure anything other than a DC signal or
sine wave. DMM's featuring "True RMS Measurement" are
for non-linear voltage and current loads. This feature is
necessary when taking AC Voltage and Current measurements.
There are several methods to incorporate the RMS feature into
a DMM. Each handles AC differently. The following are three basic
types:
- A rectifier type multimeter indicated RMS values for
sinewaves only. It does this by measuring average voltage and
multiplying it by 1.11 to find RMS. Trying to use this type of
meter with any wave form other than a sine wave will result in
erroneous RMS.
- Average reading digital volt meters are just that, they
measure average voltage for an AC.
- A True RMS meter uses a complex RMS converter to read RMS for
any type of AC waveform.
Unfortunately, True RMS reading meters are very expensive; thus
careful consideration should be given as to what type DMM will
best suit your specific needs.
The most important factor to keep in mind is that electrical
test equipment should be used with respect and maintained in
accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. As with all
electrical test equipment, individuals using a DMM should receive
training in its proper operation.
Back to Contents
 |
An Overview of Kynar® |
Kynar®, or polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) resin is a
fluoropolymer that is highly resistant to chemicals. It is used in
piping, tubing, vessel fabrication, molded valves and fittings,
tower packing, nozzles and other items intended for corrosive
fluid handling. Its inherent chemical resistance and high purity
makes it ideal for applications in contact with high purity water,
acids, chlorine, halogenated solvents and petrochemical mixtures.
Physical properties of Kynar that make it specially suited
for laboratory applications are outlined in the following chart:
| Maximum use temperature |
150°C |
| Heat deflection temperature (temperature at which a bar
deflects 0.01" at 66 psig |
139°C |
| Brittleness temperature (temperature at which an item may
break or crack if dropped |
-62°C |
| Transparency |
Translucent |
| Autoclaving (121°, 15 psig for 20 minutes) |
Yes |
| Sterilization |
| Gas (ethylene oxide, formaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide) |
Yes |
| Dry heat (160°C, 120 minutes) |
No |
| Radiation [gamma irradiation at 25 kGy (2.5 Mrad)] |
No |
| Disinfectants (benzalkonium chloride,
formalin/formaldehyde, ethanol, etc.) |
Yes |
| Specific gravity |
1.75 |
| Flexibility |
Rigid |
| Water Absorption |
0.05% |
| Non-Cytotoxicity (USP and ASTM biocompatibility testing
standards) |
Yes |
| Suitability for Food and Beverage Use: (21 CFR 177.2510) |
Yes |
Back to Contents
 |
NIOSH Issues Noise Exposure Criteria |
With about 30 million workers exposed to hazardous levels of
noise, hearing loss is among the most common workplace diseases in
the country. In 1972, NIOSH published their Criteria for a
Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Noise, which
provided the basis for a recommended standard to reduce the risk
of developing permanent hearing loss as a result of occupational
noise exposure. NIOSH recently evaluated the latest scientific
information and subsequently revised some of its previous
recommendations. The 1998 recommendations go beyond attempting to
conserve hearing by focusing on preventing occupational
noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). The following are some of the
highlights from the new NIOSH recommendations.
NIOSH proposes a new recommended exposure limit (REL) of 85
decibels, A-weighted, as an eight-hour time-weighted average.
Exposures above this level would be considered hazardous. The new
risk assessment reaffirms support for the 85 DBA REL. Additional
research has shown that at the REL the risk of developing NIHL
will be reduced to 8% as compared to 25% at the 90 DBA permissible
exposure limit currently enforced by OSHA and the Mine Safety and
Health Administration (MSHA).
A recommended change involving audiometric evaluation will
aid in early identification of advancing hearing loss. In workers
whose hearing threshold loss has increased because of occupational
noise exposure, NIOSH no longer recommends age correction on
individual audiograms. This will allow timely intervention to
prevent further hearing loss from occurring. OSHA currently allows
age correction only as an option. The recommended change to the
criterion for significant threshold shift will be an increase of
15 DBA in the hearing threshold level at 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz,
3000 Hz, 4000 Hz, or 6000 Hz in either ear, as determined by two
consecutive tests.
The Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) calculation is modified
under the new NIOSH recommendations. In 1972, NIOSH recommended
the use of the full NRR value; NIOSH now recommends "derating"
by subtracting from the assigned NRR 25% for earmuffs, 50% for
formable earplugs, and 70% for all other earplugs. OSHA derates
the NRR by one-half for all types of hearing protectors. NIOSH's
recommended variable derating scheme takes into consideration the
performance characteristics of different types of hearing
protectors.
NIOSH also provides recommendations for the management of
hearing loss prevention programs for workers whose noise exposures
equal or exceed the REL. The program would include exposure
assessment, engineering and administrative controls, proper use of
hearing protectors, audiometric evaluation, and program audits and
evaluations. These program management components are not
articulated in the 1972 criteria document and are not included in
the OSHA and MSHA standards.
OSHA is not likely to revise its occupational noise standard
any time soon. Susan Hall Fleming, an OSHA spokeswoman, said, "We're
looking at the new information." No official course of action
has been decided at this point.
To obtain a copy of this criteria document contact NIOSH at
1-800-356-4674 and request publication number 98-126. The document
can also be accessed on their Web site at
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh.
Back to Contents
 |
Employee Input Increases Under Confined Space Revisions |
During the final quarter of '98 OSHA amended its Confined Space
Standard (29 CFR 1910.146). The rule amends the requirements on
permit-required confined spaces to provide for enhanced employee
participation in the employer's program. The changes became
effective Feb. 1, '99.
What OSHA did, specifically, is revise paragraphs (d),
Permit-Required Confined Space Program, and (e), Permit System,
and add a new paragraph (l), Employee Participation, to allow for
greater employee participation and access to information. OSHA
also revised paragraphs (c), General Requirements, and (d) to
specify that the employers must provide those employees must
provide those employees who are authorized permit-space entrants,
or their authorized representatives, an opportunity to observe any
testing of the space that is conducted prior to entry or
subsequent to such an entry.
OSHA believes these revisions are necessary to ensure permit
space entrants, whose work often requires entry into potentially
life-threatening atmospheres, have the information necessary to
protect themselves ad their co-workers from confined space
hazards.
In addition, paragraph (k), Rescue and Emergency Services,
was revised to clarify the criteria employers must satisfy when
selecting a rescue team or service to rescue incapacitated permit
space entrants. To further address this area a non-mandatory
appendix was also added to the standard to assist employers in
selecting appropriately training and equipped rescuers.
Back to Contents
 |
Beware of Beryllium: An Overview of a Deadly Dust |
Beryllium is a hard, grayish metal. It is commercially mined for
use in electrical parts, machinery, aircraft parts and computers.
Beryllium is the lightest structural metal known and has high heat
capacity and thermal conductivity. It is commonly used as an
alloying agent to produce materials with desired lightness,
stiffness, and dimensional stability. As an alloying agent for
beryllium copper, it is used in manufacturing nonsparking tools.
Health Effects
Despite its many attributes, beryllium poses some very real
hazards. Exposure to beryllium can cause chronic beryllium disease
(CBD), an incurable illness that is characterized by shortness of
breath and a nonproductive cough. The onset of CBD follows
sensitization and immune response to the inhalation of beryllium
or its alloys. CBD may involve other organs, but the lungs are the
primary target. It can appear after a long latency, with years
passing between exposure and the onset of illness. Although
incurable, treatment with steroid drugs can add a measure of
comfort to sufferers of CBD. The Department of Health and Human
Services has determined that beryllium and certain beryllium
compounds "may reasonable be anticipated to be carcinogens."
This determination is based on animal studies and studies of
workers. While none of the studies provide conclusive evidence,
they indicate that long-term exposure to beryllium in the air
results in an increased incidence of lung cancer.
Exposure Limits
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) restricts the
amount of beryllium that industries may emit into the environment
to 10 grams in a 24 hour period, or to an amount that would result
in atmospheric levels of .01 micrograms (µg) per cubic meter,
averaged over a 30 day period.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) recommends exposure limits of .5µg of beryllium per
cubic meter of workroom air during an 9-hour shift.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sets
a limit at 2µg of beryllium per cubic meter of workroom air
for an 8 hour shift.
Personal Protective Equipment
Engineering controls such as ventilation systems should be
implemented to control airborne concentrations. In addition,
personal air samplers should be used to determine exposure levels.
In terms of respiratory protection, it's best to consult with the
respirator manufacturer for the appropriate filter and its maximum
use concentration. Most manufacturers suggest air purifying
respirators equipped with N100 of P100 filters, while others state
N95 filters are sufficient. Impervious gloves, boots, and clothing
should be used to prevent prolonged or repeated skin contact. Good
housekeeping practices are mandatory, and work clothing should be
changed and not taken home for cleaning.
Additional sources of information on beryllium include:
Back to Contents
 |
Ask a Tech Rep |
|
by Mark MahoneyTechnical
Representative
|
| Q. |
I recently received the
results from a noise level survey in our plant. The results show
the employees are exposed to a 80% accumulated dose over an 8
hour period. The safety director is asking me what the results
are as an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average). |
| A. |
To convert an accumulated dose
exposure in percent to an 8-hour time weighted average reading,
use the following formula.
TWA = 16.61 log10 (D/100) + 90
To illustrate the example with 80% dose would be calx
TWA = 16.61 log10 (80/100) + 90
TWA = 16.61 log10 (.8) + 90
TWA = 16.61 (-0.09691) + 91
TWA = -1.6096751 + 90
TWA = 88.39
Therefore an accumulated dose of 80% = an 8-hour TWA of
88.39.
Table A-1 published in 29 CFR 1910.95, The occupational
noise exposure regulation, offers conversions from percent noise
exposure of "dose" to 8-hour time-weighted average. |
| Q. |
I have just been asked to
purchase hearing protection for our employees on the shop floor.
The results of a recent noise level survey show the employees
are exposed to a time weighted average (TWA) of 105 dBA
(decibels on the A scale). When looking through the Lab Safety
Supply catalog I noticed ear muffs with an NRR (Noise Reduction
Rating) of 29 dB. If we purchase these what will the noise
exposure be to the employees when wearing the earmuffs? Is there
any way to increase this NRR? |
| A. |
With noise readings that are
recorded on the A scale from a noise monitoring instrument, the
following would be the calculation to estimate the adequacy of
the hearing protectors.
29 dBA - 7 dB (OSHA's adjustment factor) = 22 dBA would be
the protection factor.
105 dBA - 22 dBA = 83 dBA would be the noise exposure with
hearing protectors.
OSHA also recommends using a 50% safety factor for
calculation because the NRR is based on testing in ideal
conditions. Therefore the NRR in this situation would be
29 - 7 = 22/2 = 11.
11 db would be the NRR with the 50% safety factor applied.
For noise measurements taken on the C scale the adjustment
of 7dB is not used. For example with an exposure of 105 dBC and
hearing protectors with an NRR of 29 you would subtract 29 from
105. This results in a noise exposure of 76 dBC.
There is one way that you can improve the NRR of the
hearing protectors. That is to use ear plugs and ear muffs in
combination. When this is done OSHA allows 5 dB to be added to
the greater of the two NRRs. |
Back to Contents
 |
worth noting . . . . . . |
. . . An informational "Fact Sheet" offering
guidelines for protecting workers from the cold was published by
OSHA in December. The document, entitled "Fact Sheet:
Protecting Workers in Cold Environments" is available at
OSHA's Web site (http://www.osha.gov)
under December '98 News Releases . . .
. . . The House passed bill H.R. 4037 to amend OSHA's hazardous
communication (Hazcom) standard. This bill requires OSHA to
recognize electronic copies of material safety data sheets (MSDS)
. . .
. . . OSHA has new interactive advisory software programs:
Safety Pays, Hazard Awareness Advisor, Logging, Respiratory
Protection, and Silica. The software can be downloaded from
http://www.osha.gov/oshasoft
. . .
. . . In addition to OSHA's programs, there are other online
training resources available. Here are a few sites to check out:
http://www.free-training.com
(training on Hazcom, forklift safety, PPE, etc.);
http://www.knowledgewire.com
(for generic and customized safety and health training);
http://www.osh.net (OSHA
regulations, chemical hazards, job links, and a safety and health
chat room); http://www.safetyontheweb.com
(graphic and video training); http://www.nsc.org
(regulatory information and statistics, including accident facts)
. . .
Back to Contents
TECHlines® is published bi-monthly by Lab
Safety Supply Inc., PO Box 1368, Janesville, Wisconsin
53547-1368.
TECHlines®'s goal is to provide accurate
information on the subject matter covered. However, it is
impossible to guarantee absolute accuracy of the materials. The
publisher, therefore, cannot assume any responsibility for
omissions, errors or misprinting contained within this
publication.
For additional information, call Lab Safety Supply's
Safety TECHline® at 1-800-356-2501. |